The Zambia 2010
Living Conditions Monitoring Survey Report is now published and available. It
makes interesting reading, though it runs to 304 pages. However, an electronic version
can be easily downloaded through the Zambian Economist site:
http:/www.zambian-economist.com
The 2010 ZLCMS
followed on from the 2006 ZLCMS, both looked at community needs and the
impact of programmes designed to promote social, economic and community
development in the community. They collected data on the sort of social
and economic development people would like to see in their community.
There were 14
categories and participants could choose 4. They also enquired about any recent
changes in the last year and the extent to which they were an improvement.
Having the two reports meant that comparisons and changes over time could be
examined too. The table below contains the 2010 % figures listing people's
choice of projects.
DEVELOPMENT
|
Rural
|
Urban
|
Zambia
|
Health
|
47.0
|
27.1
|
39.9
|
Food and other Consumer Goods
|
42.0
|
34.4
|
39.3
|
Water Supply
|
41.8
|
24.0
|
35.4
|
Education
|
34.1
|
24.5
|
30.7
|
Agricultural
|
33.5
|
7.3
|
24.1
|
Roads
|
22.6
|
24.3
|
23.2
|
Employment
|
5.2
|
18.9
|
10.1
|
Police/Security
|
9.2
|
8.3
|
8.9
|
Sanitation
|
4.2
|
17.3
|
8.9
|
Hammer mills
|
12.4
|
2.3
|
8.8
|
Credit
|
6.6
|
8.5
|
7.3
|
Housing
|
3.6
|
6.5
|
4.6
|
Transport
|
4.3
|
2.5
|
3.6
|
Not stated
|
2.7
|
9.8
|
5.3
|
Number of
households: 16 000 000 (Rural) 891 000 (Urban) 2 491 000 (All Zambia) 176 000
(Western Province)
We see 40% of all
Zambian households overall wanted health services provided in their community;
this was the first choice in rural areas, but not in urban areas where people
most wanted food and other consumer goods. Unsurprisingly, the number of
households listing water supply, education, agricultural and hammer mills is
higher in rural than urban areas, while households wanting employment and
sanitation is higher in urban than rural areas. This was also the case in 2006.
Over time there
have been interesting drops in percentages such as urban households wanting
employment (33% in 2006 compared to 19% in 2010). This suggests that the urban
economy is creating jobs. This is to be expected if the reported annual growth
rate of 6-7% is to be believed. Health services, food and consumer goods and
water supply came in first second and third for both years, however, the number
of households preferring these fell from 48% in 2006 to 39% in 2010. The
proportion stating that they would like a water supply fell from 43% in 2006 to
35% in 2010, with the rural and urban proportions falling by similar levels.
The desire for
better roads increased from 17% in 2006 to 24% in 2010.
In 2010, around
50% of households overall indicated that they would like to see roads improved
in their communities; though this proportion has dropped from 59% in 2006,
although it was the top project to be improved in 2006.
Almost 30% of
households in 2010 indicated that they would like health and education
facilities to be improved in their communities; in rural areas, 37% wanted an
improvement in education facilities and 31% with health facilities, whilst n urban
households the desire for health facilities was substantially higher than
education facilities, 27% and 16% respectively. Urban households also generally
preferred improved sanitation and police/security, whilst rural people opted
for agriculture and hammer-mills. There were similar trends in 2006.
Both the 2010 and
2006 LCMS considered a period of 12 months prior to the survey when asking
whether projects or changes had taken place in the community. In both 2010 and
2006, most households said the greatest changes were in the field of
communication with the coming of cellphone networks. More urban than rural
households were affected and over all the percentage dropped from 49-36%. This
was also the trend for improved radio and TV reception.
Transport
services were ranked 6th in both years, with twice as many urban than rural
respondents listing this.
Police services
ranked 9th in both years, again urban households listed this project roughly
three times more frequently than the rural population.
School rehabilitation
moved from 26% in 2006 to 15% of households in 2010; in 2006, the rural
proportion was 30% with the difference between the two areas narrowing. The
only projects for which importance scores increased notably over time were
‘building of new school’ and ‘rehabilitation of an existing school’.
To summarise, the
most important and greatest impact projects were cell phone, radio reception,
health services, transport, hammermill and new schools. Other areas where there
were falls in importance and noted improvements were found in sanitation, piped
water and vet services
We have from time
to time kept an eye on the food basket so it is good from this report to have a
chance to monitor it over time.
FOOD BASKET FOR A
FAMILY OF SIX 2004-2010 in Unrebased Kwacha
ITEMS
|
Quantity
|
UP
2004
|
Cost2004
|
UP
2006
|
Cost2006
|
UP2010
|
Cost2010
|
Cooking
Oil
|
2.5l
|
19
628
|
19
628
|
17
653
|
17
653
|
28
698
|
28
698
|
Beans
|
2
kg
|
4760
|
9520
|
6041
|
12082
|
8746
|
17492
|
Dry
Fish
|
1
kg
|
21856
|
21856
|
22317
|
22317
|
30522
|
30522
|
Kapenta
|
2kg
|
30062
|
60124
|
30336
|
60672
|
49225
|
98450
|
Milk
|
2l
|
2005
|
8020
|
2186
|
8744
|
3298
|
13192
|
Onion
|
4kg
|
3040
|
12160
|
3864
|
15456
|
4765
|
19060
|
Groundnuts
|
3kg
|
5425
|
16275
|
5743
|
17229
|
7705
|
23115
|
Salt
|
1kg
|
1880
|
1880
|
2424
|
2424
|
4516
|
4516
|
Tomatoes
|
4kg
|
1846
|
7384
|
2253
|
9012
|
3073
|
12292
|
Roller
Meal
|
25kg
x
3.6
|
25220
|
90792
|
26288
|
94637
|
47736
|
171850
|
Vegetables
|
7.5kg
|
1437
|
10777
|
2070
|
15525
|
2185
|
16388
|
Total Cost: K258 416
(2004) K275 751
(2006) K435 574 (2010)
Poverty Line: K57
172 (2004) K61007 (2006) K96 356 (2008)
(Adult Equivalent)
The report dealt with a number of different
areas using statistics gathered from 2010 census. It covered a wide range of
topics, including demographics, migration, health education, economic
activities, household assets, income and expenditure, poverty analysis and
coping strategies, housing, child health and nutrition and ending with
community development.
It was also useful to be able to take a few
snap-shots of Western Province from the tables and see where we stand in the
league table in comparison with the rest of Zambia.
2010
Toilets:
No facilities (% of Households)
Western Province Zambia
53.4% 12.6%
Fuel
Use:
Firewood 87 57
Charcoal 7.0 27
Electricity 2.5 16
Light
Energy:
Paraffin 30 42
Electricity 3.5 19
Candles 22 22
Diesel 4.6 8.0
Fire 31 7.5
Torch 0.6 0.2
Solar 0.8 1.0
Other 1.5 1.5
None 5.0 1.0
Electric
Connection:
Yes 4.0 22
No 94 77
Access
to treated drinking water:
Yes 6.0 32
No 94 68
Living
in traditional daub, wattle, mud and thatched hut:
75
38
Living
in an improved dwelling - (zinc roofed ‘flat’):
15
23
Meals
per day:
One: 5.0 4.0
Two: 62 46
Three: 33 47
%
of Household Expenditure on Food and Non-food items:
Food items 58 42
Non food items 42 58
Monthly
Household Expenditure:
Total K482 K970
Food K278 K470
Non-Food K202 K486
Per Capita K121 K226 `
In reading this report and seeing all
these figures you realize that these are millions of individual people's life
stories. This awful poverty is not God's fault for he has provided us
with all the earth's resources, nor is it the fault of the poor since most
are born in to it. Nor can it just be put down to greed,
indifference, incompetence, corruption or a legacy from colonialism, though all
have had a share in creating it. This is not just an economic and
political matter it is a moral one. How long are these gross
inequalities going to be allowed to continue? These statistics bring
to light widespread social injustice that ignores hunger and stunted
children, the alienation of the poor and the indignity of impoverished lives.
In 2 Corinthians 8 Paul gives some
practical advice on the matter:
Our desire is not that others might be
relieved while you are hard-pressed but that there might be equality. At the
present time your plenty will supply what they need so that in turn their
plenty will supply what you need. Then there will be equality, as it is
written: 'They who gathered much did not have too much, and they who
gathered little did not have too little.'